You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Jeremy Bigelow v. Bernardo Sanchez Ramos, Onar Misleh Ans Kristina Misleh

Citation: Not availableDocket: 01-22-00644-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; April 13, 2023; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case before the Texas Court of Appeals involved an appeal by Jeremy Bigelow against several appellees following a final judgment by the 151st District Court of Harris County. Bigelow's appeal faced procedural challenges due to his failure to comply with essential appellate requirements. Initially, he neglected to pay the mandatory $205 filing fee or provide a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment, despite being notified of these obligations. Furthermore, Bigelow failed to request or arrange payment for the reporter’s record, which was necessary for the appeal's progression. These omissions resulted in multiple notifications and deadlines provided by the Court, which Bigelow did not adequately address. Consequently, the appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, citing Bigelow's repeated non-compliance with procedural rules. The Court, comprising Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris, granted the motion, dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution due to Bigelow's failure to adhere to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which mandate compliance with filing and payment directives. The dismissal rendered any pending motions moot, concluding the appellate process due to procedural defaults.

Legal Issues Addressed

Consequences of Noncompliance with Court Orders

Application: The failure to comply with court orders and payment requirements led to the dismissal of Bigelow's appeal, as stipulated under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Reasoning: Under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, a non-indigent party must pay required filing fees, and failure to comply with court orders may lead to dismissal.

Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Application: The Court of Appeals dismissed Bigelow's appeal due to his failure to pay necessary fees, file a docketing statement, and submit required appellate records within specified deadlines.

Reasoning: Consequently, the Court granted the Appellees' motion to dismiss Bigelow's appeal due to his multiple omissions, dismissing any pending motions as moot.

Obligation to Pay Appellate Filing Fees

Application: In this case, the appellant, Jeremy Bigelow, was required to pay a $205 filing fee as part of the appellate process, unless he could demonstrate indigence or provide a valid justification for non-payment.

Reasoning: Bigelow was given 20 days to pay this fee. The letter also warned that failure to file the clerk’s and reporter’s records could result in dismissal for want of prosecution.

Requirement to File Clerk’s and Reporter’s Records

Application: Bigelow's appeal was jeopardized because he failed to request or make arrangements for the reporter’s record, despite being notified of the deadline and his non-indigent status.

Reasoning: On October 18, 2022, the court reporter informed the Court that a reporter's record was available but that Bigelow had not requested it or made arrangements to pay for it, despite not being indigent.