Narrative Opinion Summary
The Third District Court of Appeal of Florida issued an opinion on March 22, 2023, regarding case No. 3D22-988, involving Daryle Chestnut as the Appellant and Angeleatha Chestnut as the Appellee. The appeal stemmed from a non-final order by the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, presided over by Judge Maria Espinosa Dennis. The legal representation for the Appellant was provided by the Law Office of Ama N. Appiah, P.A., while the Appellee was represented by Jackson-Holmes P.A. The court, composed of Judges Logue, Hendon, and Bokor, rendered a per curiam decision, affirming the lower tribunal's ruling. The opinion is not considered final until the resolution of any timely filed motion for rehearing.
Legal Issues Addressed
Finality of Appellate Opinionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The opinion is subject to change until any filed motion for rehearing is resolved, highlighting the non-finality of appellate decisions until procedural opportunities are exhausted.
Reasoning: The opinion is not considered final until the resolution of any timely filed motion for rehearing.
Non-Final Orders and Appealssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appeal was made against a non-final order, indicating that appellate review is permissible for certain interlocutory decisions.
Reasoning: The appeal stemmed from a non-final order by the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, presided over by Judge Maria Espinosa Dennis.
Per Curiam Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court issued a per curiam decision, signifying a unanimous and unsigned ruling by the panel of judges.
Reasoning: The court, composed of Judges Logue, Hendon, and Bokor, rendered a per curiam decision, affirming the lower tribunal's ruling.