You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

D & R Enterprise, Inc. v. SCF RC Funding IV, LLC Essential Properties Realty Trust, LLC (A/K/A) SCF Realty Capital LLC and Mesa Fortune, Inc. US Assets Acquisitions, LLC D/B/A US Assets, LLC US Assets, Inc. Jefferey Love A/K/A Jeff Love David Fettner And Greg Seibert

Citation: Not availableDocket: 14-22-00563-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; December 5, 2022; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

An order was issued on December 6, 2022, by the Fourteenth Court of Appeals regarding case number 14-22-00563-CV, involving D. R. Enterprise, Inc. as the appellant against multiple appellees including SCF RC Funding IV, LLC, Essential Properties Realty Trust, LLC (a/k/a SCF Realty Capital LLC), Mesa Fortune, Inc., US Assets Acquisitions, LLC (d/b/a US Assets, LLC), US Assets, Inc., Jefferey Love (a/k/a Jeff Love), David Fettner, and Greg Seibert. The appeal originated from the 152nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, under trial court cause number 2021-47415. The official court reporter was instructed to file the reporter’s record, which was due on November 28, 2022, as no request for an extension had been made. The court emphasized the need for timely filing of the record and mandated its submission within 10 days from the date of the order. The panel for this order included Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.

Legal Issues Addressed

Filing of Reporter’s Record

Application: The court emphasized the necessity for the timely filing of the reporter's record, mandating its submission within a specified period after the due date.

Reasoning: The official court reporter was instructed to file the reporter’s record, which was due on November 28, 2022, as no request for an extension had been made.

Judicial Authority in Ensuring Record Submission

Application: The court exercised its authority to mandate the submission of the reporter’s record within a strict timeline to prevent delays in the appeal process.

Reasoning: The court emphasized the need for timely filing of the record and mandated its submission within 10 days from the date of the order.