Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
Citation: 539 U.S. 974Docket: No. 02-1674; No. 02-1675; No. 02-1676; No. 02-1702; No. 02-1727; No. 02-1733; No. 02-1734; No. 02-1740; No. 02-1747; No. 02-1753; No. 02-1755; No. 02-1756
Court: Supreme Court of the United States; August 4, 2003; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court
Probable jurisdiction has been noted in the case referenced. The motion for a divided argument by plaintiffs in cases Nos. 02-1674, 02-1727, 02-1733, 02-1734, 02-1753, 02-1755, and 02-1756 has been granted, allocating 60 minutes for argument on Title I and §213 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, with 50 minutes for the remaining challenged provisions. Additionally, the motion of Emily Echols et al. and Barret Austin O’Brock for a divided argument is granted, limited to 10 minutes for plaintiffs. However, motions for divided argument by plaintiffs in cases Nos. 02-1675, 02-1740, and 02-1747 have been denied. The Solicitor General's motion for a divided argument has been granted.