You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Mitchell v. Helms

Citation: 530 U.S. 1296Docket: No. 98-1648; No. 99-1556; No. 99-1582; No. 99-1771; No. 99-1779; No. 99-1794; No. 99-1837; No. 99-7643; No. 99-8341; No. 99-8587; No. 99-8724; No. 99-8888; No. 99-9047; No. 99-9049; No. 99-9104; No. 99-9223; No. 99-9250; No. 99-9356; No. 99-9487; No. 99-9

Court: Supreme Court of the United States; August 28, 2000; Federal Supreme Court; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Petitions for rehearing have been denied for multiple cases, specifically identified by their respective docket numbers, including Nos. 99-1794, 99-1887, 99-7643, 99-8341, 99-8587, 99-8724, 99-8888, 99-9047, 99-9049, 99-9104, 99-9223, 99-9250, 99-9356, 99-9487, 99-9533, 99-9632, and 99-9772. Relevant precedents cited include various Supreme Court decisions denoted by their citation numbers. The document references multiple pages for additional context and details related to these cases.

Legal Issues Addressed

Citation of Supreme Court Precedents

Application: The court referenced established Supreme Court decisions to provide precedential support in the context of the denied petitions.

Reasoning: Relevant precedents cited include various Supreme Court decisions denoted by their citation numbers.

Denial of Petitions for Rehearing

Application: The court applied the principle that petitions for rehearing may be denied, as evidenced by the denial of such petitions in multiple identified cases.

Reasoning: Petitions for rehearing have been denied for multiple cases, specifically identified by their respective docket numbers, including Nos. 99-1794, 99-1887, 99-7643, 99-8341, 99-8587, 99-8724, 99-8888, 99-9047, 99-9049, 99-9104, 99-9223, 99-9250, 99-9356, 99-9487, 99-9533, 99-9632, and 99-9772.

Reference to Supplementary Case Information

Application: The opinion notes that multiple pages are referenced for additional context and details regarding the identified cases.

Reasoning: The document references multiple pages for additional context and details related to these cases.