Narrative Opinion Summary
Certiorari was granted by the C. A. 3d Cir. regarding the cases listed. The motion by petitioners County of Allegheny et al. for a divided argument was denied. However, the motion by petitioner Chabad for a divided argument was granted, allocating 10 minutes for petitioner in case No. 88-90 and 20 minutes for petitioners in cases Nos. 87-2050 and 88-96. The motion by petitioner City of Pittsburgh for a divided argument was denied. Additionally, the motion by respondent Malik Tunador for a divided argument and for extra time for oral argument was also denied.
Legal Issues Addressed
Certiorari Grantedsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court granted certiorari to review the cases presented by the petitioners.
Reasoning: Certiorari was granted by the C. A. 3d Cir. regarding the cases listed.
Denial of Motion for Extra Timesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The respondent's request for extra time for oral argument was denied by the court.
Reasoning: Additionally, the motion by respondent Malik Tunador for a divided argument and for extra time for oral argument was also denied.
Motion for Divided Argumentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court examined several motions for divided argument, granting some while denying others based on the specifics of each case.
Reasoning: The motion by petitioners County of Allegheny et al. for a divided argument was denied. However, the motion by petitioner Chabad for a divided argument was granted, allocating 10 minutes for petitioner in case No. 88-90 and 20 minutes for petitioners in cases Nos. 87-2050 and 88-96.