Narrative Opinion Summary
The Court, presided over by Judge Oberdorfer, reviewed the Motion to Relieve Defendant Patrick Mahoney from a previous Order dated March 15, 1993, which is documented at 816 F.Supp. 729. There was no opposition from the plaintiffs regarding this motion. As a result, on April 6, 1993, the Court ordered that paragraph e on page 737 of the March 16, 1993, Order, which pertains specifically to Patrick Mahoney, is vacated.
Legal Issues Addressed
Modification of Court Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court exercised its power to modify an existing order by vacating a specific paragraph related to the defendant, demonstrating the court's authority to amend prior decisions.
Reasoning: As a result, on April 6, 1993, the Court ordered that paragraph e on page 737 of the March 16, 1993, Order, which pertains specifically to Patrick Mahoney, is vacated.
Unopposed Motionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: In this case, the absence of opposition from the plaintiffs led to the court granting the motion to relieve the defendant from the specific order.
Reasoning: There was no opposition from the plaintiffs regarding this motion.
Vacating Court Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The legal principle of vacating a court order is applied when the court decides to nullify a specific part of a previous order due to a motion filed by a party involved, with no opposition from the other party.
Reasoning: The Court, presided over by Judge Oberdorfer, reviewed the Motion to Relieve Defendant Patrick Mahoney from a previous Order dated March 15, 1993, which is documented at 816 F.Supp. 729.