You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

State v. Cramer

Citation: Not availableDocket: SCWC-11-0000085

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court; September 6, 2012; Hawaii; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i has accepted the application for a writ of certiorari filed by Stephen Cramer, Jr. on July 31, 2012. This case, initially from the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA No. CAAP-11-0000085; CR. No. 07-1-0679(2)), will proceed to oral argument, with scheduling to be communicated to the parties by the appellate clerk. The order was issued by Chief Justice Mark E. Recktenwald and Justices Paula A. Nakayama, Simeon R. Acoba, Jr., Sabrina S. McKenna, and Richard W. Pollack on September 6, 2012.

Legal Issues Addressed

Acceptance of Writ of Certiorari

Application: The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i has accepted the application for a writ of certiorari, indicating the court's decision to review the case from a lower court.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i has accepted the application for a writ of certiorari filed by Stephen Cramer, Jr. on July 31, 2012.

Judicial Order Issuance

Application: The order regarding the acceptance of the writ of certiorari and the scheduling of oral arguments was issued by the Chief Justice and the associated justices of the court.

Reasoning: The order was issued by Chief Justice Mark E. Recktenwald and Justices Paula A. Nakayama, Simeon R. Acoba, Jr., Sabrina S. McKenna, and Richard W. Pollack on September 6, 2012.

Proceeding to Oral Argument

Application: The case will proceed to oral argument following the acceptance of the writ of certiorari, with the schedule to be determined by the appellate clerk.

Reasoning: This case, initially from the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA No. CAAP-11-0000085; CR. No. 07-1-0679(2)), will proceed to oral argument, with scheduling to be communicated to the parties by the appellate clerk.