Narrative Opinion Summary
The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i has accepted the Application for Writ of Certiorari filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, which acts as the trustee under the Pooling and Service Agreement for the IMPAC Secured Assets Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-2. This decision follows an appeal from the Intermediate Court of Appeals concerning a case designated as DC Civ. No. 09-1-1872. The order was issued by Chief Justice Mark E. Recktenwald and Justices Paula A. Nakayama, Simeon R. Acoba, James E. Duffy, and Sabrina S. McKenna on October 12, 2011. Legal representation included Charles R. Prather and Peter K. Keegan for the petitioner, and James Richard McCarty for the respondent.
Legal Issues Addressed
Acceptance of Writ of Certiorarisubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i has accepted the application for a writ of certiorari filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, indicating the court's decision to review the case following an appeal.
Reasoning: The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i has accepted the Application for Writ of Certiorari filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, which acts as the trustee under the Pooling and Service Agreement for the IMPAC Secured Assets Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-2.
Judicial Authority on Appealssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Supreme Court's decision to accept the writ of certiorari demonstrates its authority to review decisions from lower appellate courts.
Reasoning: This decision follows an appeal from the Intermediate Court of Appeals concerning a case designated as DC Civ. No. 09-1-1872.
Judicial Panel Compositionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The order regarding the writ of certiorari was issued by a panel of five Justices, reflecting the composition of the court in making this decision.
Reasoning: The order was issued by Chief Justice Mark E. Recktenwald and Justices Paula A. Nakayama, Simeon R. Acoba, James E. Duffy, and Sabrina S. McKenna on October 12, 2011.
Legal Representationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case involved legal representation for both parties, illustrating the involvement of legal counsel in the certiorari process.
Reasoning: Legal representation included Charles R. Prather and Peter K. Keegan for the petitioner, and James Richard McCarty for the respondent.