You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Alakai Na Keiki, Inc. v. Hamamoto

Citation: Not availableDocket: SCWC-29742

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court; October 28, 2011; Hawaii; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of Hawai'i accepted the Application for Writ of Certiorari filed by Alaka'i Na Keiki, Inc. on September 14, 2011, concerning case number SCWC-29742. This case involves Kathryn Matayoshi, the current Superintendent of Education, who has replaced Patricia Hamamoto, the Superintendent at the time of the initial circuit court decision. The Court will schedule oral arguments and notify the parties involved regarding the scheduling details. The order was issued on October 28, 2011, and signed by Chief Justice Mark E. Recktenwald and Associate Justices Paula A. Nakayama, Simeon R. Acoba, Jr., James E. Duffy, Jr., and Sabrina S. McKenna.

Legal Issues Addressed

Acceptance of Writ of Certiorari

Application: The Supreme Court of Hawai'i accepted the Application for Writ of Certiorari filed by Alaka'i Na Keiki, Inc., indicating that the court will review the lower court's decision.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court of Hawai'i accepted the Application for Writ of Certiorari filed by Alaka'i Na Keiki, Inc. on September 14, 2011, concerning case number SCWC-29742.

Scheduling of Oral Arguments

Application: The court's decision to schedule oral arguments demonstrates the procedural step following the acceptance of a writ of certiorari, allowing parties to present their arguments in person.

Reasoning: The Court will schedule oral arguments and notify the parties involved regarding the scheduling details.

Substitution of Party in Appeal

Application: The substitution of Kathryn Matayoshi for Patricia Hamamoto as the Superintendent of Education reflects the procedural allowance for substituting parties when official positions change during litigation.

Reasoning: This case involves Kathryn Matayoshi, the current Superintendent of Education, who has replaced Patricia Hamamoto, the Superintendent at the time of the initial circuit court decision.