Narrative Opinion Summary
The Federal Public Defender representing Edgar Hugo Munoz-Ramirez has requested to withdraw from the case and submitted a brief under Anders v. California and United States v. Flores. Munoz-Ramirez did not respond to this motion. After reviewing the brief and relevant record, the court agrees with the counsel's conclusion that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Consequently, the motion to withdraw is granted, counsel is relieved of further duties, and the appeal is dismissed. The opinion is deemed non-publishable and not precedential, except under specific circumstances outlined in the local rules.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Nonfrivolous Issuessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appeal is dismissed after the court concurs with the counsel's assessment that there are no nonfrivolous issues present for appeal.
Reasoning: After reviewing the brief and relevant record, the court agrees with the counsel's conclusion that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Non-Publishable and Non-Precedential Opinionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The opinion in this case is deemed non-publishable and not precedential except under specific local rules.
Reasoning: The opinion is deemed non-publishable and not precedential, except under specific circumstances outlined in the local rules.
Withdrawal of Counsel under Anders v. Californiasubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court grants the withdrawal of the Federal Public Defender after a brief under Anders v. California was submitted, indicating no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Reasoning: The Federal Public Defender representing Edgar Hugo Munoz-Ramirez has requested to withdraw from the case and submitted a brief under Anders v. California and United States v. Flores.