Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Whorley
Citation: 669 F. App'x 669Docket: No. 16-7090
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; October 18, 2016; Federal Appellate Court
Unpublished opinions are not considered binding precedent in this circuit. Gary Vincent Whorley appeals a district court order that denied his request to produce a notarized document. Upon review, the court found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons it provided. The case referenced is United States v. Whorley, No. 3:15-cr-00010-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 1, 2016). The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the written materials. The decision is AFFIRMED.