Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
In re Randolph
Citation: 669 F. App'x 185Docket: No. 16-1653, No. 16-1885
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; October 17, 2016; Federal Appellate Court
Unpublished opinions lack binding precedent in this circuit. In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph challenges the district court’s decision to return her complaints due to non-compliance with a prefiling injunction. After reviewing the record, the court found no reversible error. Consequently, Randolph's request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the appeals are dismissed. Oral argument is deemed unnecessary as the case's facts and legal issues are sufficiently presented in the submitted materials. The appeals are dismissed.