Narrative Opinion Summary
The Federal Public Defender representing Manuel Martinez-Andres has requested permission to withdraw from the case, submitting a brief in accordance with Anders v. California and United States v. Flores. Martinez-Andres has not responded to this motion. After reviewing the brief and relevant case records, the court agrees with the counsel's conclusion that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review. Consequently, the court grants the motion to withdraw, relieves the counsel of further responsibilities, and dismisses the appeal. The opinion will not be published and is not considered precedent, except in specific circumstances as outlined in the court's rules.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review of Nonfrivolous Issuessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court reviews the brief and records submitted by counsel and agrees there are no nonfrivolous issues warranting appellate review.
Reasoning: After reviewing the brief and relevant case records, the court agrees with the counsel's conclusion that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review.
Non-publication of Opinionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court's decision will not be published and does not serve as precedent, except under specific conditions prescribed by court rules.
Reasoning: The opinion will not be published and is not considered precedent, except in specific circumstances as outlined in the court's rules.
Withdrawal of Counsel under Anders v. Californiasubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court permits the Federal Public Defender to withdraw after concluding that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review.
Reasoning: The Federal Public Defender representing Manuel Martinez-Andres has requested permission to withdraw from the case, submitting a brief in accordance with Anders v. California and United States v. Flores.