Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Fernando v. Sareen
Citation: 667 F. App'x 621Docket: No. 16-15237
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; June 28, 2016; Federal Appellate Court
Arjuna C. Fernando's appeal from the district court's dismissal of his action against Danish child welfare officials for lack of personal jurisdiction has been reviewed and affirmed. The appellate court, exercising de novo review, found that Fernando did not present sufficient facts to demonstrate that the appellees had "continuous and systematic" contacts with California necessary for general jurisdiction or that his claims were related to the appellees' activities in California for specific jurisdiction. Consequently, various motions filed by Fernando, including a motion for an injunction pending appeal and a notification of threats, were denied as moot. Additionally, the appellees' motion for sanctions was denied, while Fernando's motion to strike a specific docket entry was granted. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling, noting that this disposition is not intended for publication or as precedent, except as specified in 9th Cir. R. 36-3.