Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Mohamed
Citation: 667 F. App'x 86Docket: No. 15-4225
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; July 6, 2016; Federal Appellate Court
Unpublished opinions lack binding precedent within the circuit. Mohamed Seid Ahmed Mohamed pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and trafficking in contraband cigarettes. On appeal, he challenges his 41-month prison sentence, claiming the district court improperly denied his motion to compel the production of favorable evidence and granted the government's motion to quash a subpoena for testimony regarding such evidence. The court affirms in part and vacates in part the district court’s denial of the motion to compel, upholds the decision to quash the subpoena, and remands the case for further proceedings in alignment with a sealed opinion issued concurrently.