Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai
Citation: 665 F. App'x 310Docket: No. 16-1740
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; December 18, 2016; Federal Appellate Court
The appellate court affirmed the district court's decisions regarding Raymond A. Johnson's civil complaint, which included dismissing the complaint, imposing monetary sanctions, and a prefiling injunction. The court found no reversible error upon review of the record and upheld the district court’s reasoning. Johnson's motions to recuse opposing counsel and for additional sanctions were denied, as were the Appellees' motions for sanctions. The appellate court determined that oral argument was unnecessary since the facts and legal issues were sufficiently clear in the submitted materials. The decision is not a binding precedent in the circuit.