Narrative Opinion Summary
Peter Bernegger's appeal of the district court's order, which partially denied and partially granted his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and denied his petition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 27(a), has been reviewed. The court found no reversible error in the record. The appeal is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and the district court's order is affirmed. The case referenced is In re: Peter Bernegger, No. 1:15-cv-01495-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 2015). The court dispensed with oral argument, determining that the existing materials sufficiently presented the facts and legal issues.
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of District Court's Ordersubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court affirmed the district court's order, indicating agreement with the lower court's findings.
Reasoning: The appeal is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and the district court's order is affirmed.
Dispensing with Oral Argumentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court decided that oral argument was unnecessary as the written submissions were sufficient to resolve the issues.
Reasoning: The court dispensed with oral argument, determining that the existing materials sufficiently presented the facts and legal issues.
Motion for Reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court evaluated the district court's decision to partially deny and partially grant the motion for reconsideration and found no reversible error in the judgment.
Reasoning: Peter Bernegger's appeal of the district court's order, which partially denied and partially granted his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and denied his petition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 27(a), has been reviewed.
Proceeding In Forma Pauperis on Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appeal was granted leave to proceed without payment of fees due to the appellant's financial status.
Reasoning: The appeal is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and the district court's order is affirmed.