Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Davis v. Town of Cary
Citation: 633 F. App'x 201Docket: Nos. 15-2275, 15-2276, 15-2277, 15-2278
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; February 28, 2016; Federal Appellate Court
William Scott Davis, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his case. The appeals have been consolidated, and after reviewing the record, the court found no reversible error. The decision is affirmed based on the district court's reasoning in the case Davis v. Town of Cary, No. 5:08-cv-00176-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 19, 2015; entered Aug. 20, 2015). Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the facts and legal arguments are sufficiently presented in the submitted materials. The court affirms the lower court's ruling. Unpublished opinions, such as this one, do not serve as binding precedent in the circuit.