Narrative Opinion Summary
The Federal Public Defender representing Iram De Jesus-Perez has requested permission to withdraw from the case and submitted an Anders brief, indicating that there are no viable issues for appeal. De Jesus-Perez did not respond to this brief. Upon reviewing the brief and relevant case records, the court agrees with the defender's assessment that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review. Consequently, the court grants the motion to withdraw, dismisses the appeal, and relieves counsel of further responsibilities. The court also declares that this opinion should not be published and holds no precedential value, except under specific conditions outlined in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Legal Issues Addressed
Anders Brief Submissionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Federal Public Defender submitted an Anders brief, indicating there were no viable issues for appeal in the case of Iram De Jesus-Perez.
Reasoning: The Federal Public Defender representing Iram De Jesus-Perez has requested permission to withdraw from the case and submitted an Anders brief, indicating that there are no viable issues for appeal.
Motion to Withdrawsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court granted the motion to withdraw filed by the Federal Public Defender and relieved the counsel of further responsibilities.
Reasoning: Consequently, the court grants the motion to withdraw, dismisses the appeal, and relieves counsel of further responsibilities.
Non-Publication of Opinionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court declared that the opinion should not be published and holds no precedential value, except under specific conditions.
Reasoning: The court also declares that this opinion should not be published and holds no precedential value, except under specific conditions outlined in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Review of Appeal Viabilitysubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Upon reviewing the case records and the submission of the Anders brief, the court agreed with the assessment that there were no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review.
Reasoning: Upon reviewing the brief and relevant case records, the court agrees with the defender's assessment that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review.