Narrative Opinion Summary
Courtney Markee Gilmore appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines Amendment 782. After reviewing the record, the appellate court found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's decision. The case reference is United States v. Gilmore, No. 3:09-cr-00501-JFA-6 (D.S.C. July 29, 2015). The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the existing materials. The decision is affirmed.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review for Reversible Errorsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court conducted a review of the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision.
Reasoning: After reviewing the record, the appellate court found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's decision.
Necessity of Oral Argument in Appellate Proceedingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court decided that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.
Reasoning: The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the existing materials.
Sentence Reduction under Guidelines Amendment 782subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court reviewed and upheld the district court's decision denying a motion for sentence reduction under Guidelines Amendment 782.
Reasoning: Courtney Markee Gilmore appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines Amendment 782.