Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Randolph v. U.S. Attorney
Citation: 615 F. App'x 124Docket: Nos. 15-1497, 15-1786
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; August 31, 2015; Federal Appellate Court
Catherine Denise Randolph's appeals have been dismissed by an unpublished PER CURIAM opinion, which indicates that unpublished opinions do not serve as binding precedent in this circuit. The district court's orders were challenged, which dismissed her complaints for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Upon review, the court found no reversible error in the district court's decisions. The specific cases referenced include Randolph v. U.S. Attorney of Maryland (No. 1:15-cv-01137-JFM) and Randolph v. Lynch (No. 1:15-cv-02005-JFM). The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal arguments were sufficiently presented in the submitted materials. The appeals are therefore dismissed.