Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
In re Marshall
Citation: 604 F. App'x 295Docket: No. 15-1232
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; May 26, 2015; Federal Appellate Court
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Kalvin Marshall has been denied by an unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Marshall claimed that the district court unduly delayed in addressing his civil action and sought an order to compel action from the court. However, a review of the district court’s docket indicated that a final order denying relief had recently been entered, rendering the mandamus petition moot. The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the submitted materials.