Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Martin v. Hairston
Citation: 261 F. App'x 548Docket: No. 07-7436
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; January 23, 2008; Federal Appellate Court
Makisa Denise Martin's appeal of the district court's dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint was rejected due to her failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed the dismissal based on the reasons articulated in the lower court's ruling. The case reference is Martin v. Hairston, No. 7:07-cv-00413-JLK, 2007 WL 2781713 (W.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2007). Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately covered in the submitted materials.