Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Estrada v. Gonzales
Citation: 227 F. App'x 623Docket: No. 06-74602
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; April 9, 2007; Federal Appellate Court
Petitioner seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision from August 30, 2006, which denied the fifth motion to reopen the case due to numerical restrictions outlined in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). The regulation permits only one motion to reopen, and the BIA's denial was not an abuse of discretion. Petitioner failed to present a substantial issue to warrant further consideration, as established in United States v. Hooton. Consequently, the petition for review is denied. The decision is not suitable for publication and does not serve as a precedent per 9th Cir. R. 36-3.