You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Koscki v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.

Citation: 223 F. App'x 565Docket: No. 05-56950

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; February 26, 2007; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Laura Koscki appeals the district court's denial of her motion to reconsider the dismissal of her case against Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware. The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reviews the case for abuse of discretion. The court affirms the district court's decision, stating that it did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Koscki's action with prejudice, especially since Koscki's counsel had requested this dismissal and the motion to reconsider was filed nine months after the judgment. According to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed within ten days of the judgment, and a motion for relief must show reasons such as mistake, newly discovered evidence, or fraud. The court concludes the appeal with an affirmation of the lower court's ruling, noting that the disposition is not suitable for publication and does not serve as precedent, except as stated in 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Application: The Ninth Circuit exercises jurisdiction over the appeal as it reviews the district court's decision under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Reasoning: The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reviews the case for abuse of discretion.

Dismissal with Prejudice upon Party's Request

Application: The district court's decision to dismiss the case with prejudice was upheld because it was made at the request of Koscki's counsel.

Reasoning: The court affirms the district court's decision, stating that it did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Koscki's action with prejudice, especially since Koscki's counsel had requested this dismissal.

Non-Precedential Dispositions

Application: The court notes that its disposition is not suitable for publication and does not serve as precedent, except as stated in Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reasoning: The court concludes the appeal with an affirmation of the lower court's ruling, noting that the disposition is not suitable for publication and does not serve as precedent, except as stated in 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Standard of Review for Abuse of Discretion

Application: The appellate court reviews the district court's decision to deny the motion for reconsideration for abuse of discretion.

Reasoning: The court affirms the district court's decision, stating that it did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Koscki's action with prejudice.

Timeliness of Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment

Application: A motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed within ten days of the judgment, and Koscki's motion was filed nine months after the judgment.

Reasoning: According to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed within ten days of the judgment, and a motion for relief must show reasons such as mistake, newly discovered evidence, or fraud.