Narrative Opinion Summary
Alexis Froemling appeals the district court's summary judgment ruling against her in a lawsuit filed under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Upon reviewing the case de novo, the appellate court affirms the district court's decision, citing the detailed reasoning provided in the lower court's memorandum and order. The court notes that this opinion is not to be published and does not serve as precedent, except in specific situations outlined in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review of Lower Court Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court conducts a de novo review of the district court's summary judgment decision, affirming it based on the lower court's detailed reasoning.
Reasoning: Upon reviewing the case de novo, the appellate court affirms the district court's decision, citing the detailed reasoning provided in the lower court's memorandum and order.
Non-Precedential Opinionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The opinion issued by the appellate court is not published and is not intended to serve as precedent, except as outlined in specific circuit rules.
Reasoning: The court notes that this opinion is not to be published and does not serve as precedent, except in specific situations outlined in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Summary Judgment in Employment Discrimination Casessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court affirms the district court's grant of summary judgment against the plaintiff in a Title VII and Age Discrimination in Employment Act lawsuit.
Reasoning: Alexis Froemling appeals the district court's summary judgment ruling against her in a lawsuit filed under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.