Narrative Opinion Summary
Janeen Avis Sefren and Samuel William Sefren's appeals in criminal cases have raised arguments that are precluded by the precedent set in United States v. Contreras-Trevino, which classified a license plate frame as a “covering” under the Texas Transportation Code. The Government's motion for summary affirmance has been granted, resulting in the affirmation of the district court's judgments. This opinion is not to be published and does not serve as precedent, except in the limited circumstances outlined in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Legal Issues Addressed
Classification of License Plate Frame under Texas Transportation Codesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appeals were dismissed based on the precedent set in United States v. Contreras-Trevino, which determined that a license plate frame is considered a 'covering' under the Texas Transportation Code.
Reasoning: Janeen Avis Sefren and Samuel William Sefren's appeals in criminal cases have raised arguments that are precluded by the precedent set in United States v. Contreras-Trevino, which classified a license plate frame as a 'covering' under the Texas Transportation Code.
Non-Publication and Non-Precedential Nature of Opinionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The opinion in this case is designated as non-precedential and is not to be published, except under specific circumstances outlined in the court's rules.
Reasoning: This opinion is not to be published and does not serve as precedent, except in the limited circumstances outlined in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Precedential Effect of Summary Affirmancesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court granted the Government's motion for summary affirmance, which results in the affirmation of the district court's judgments based on existing precedent.
Reasoning: The Government's motion for summary affirmance has been granted, resulting in the affirmation of the district court's judgments.