Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Zuniga-Espinosa
Citation: 202 F. App'x 251Docket: No. 04-50614
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; September 25, 2006; Federal Appellate Court
A review of the case record, opening brief, and response to the order to show cause reveals the appeal raises insubstantial questions that do not warrant further argument. The memorandum cites precedents including *United States v. Hooton* (1982) and *United States v. Ortuno-Higare* (2006), affirming that the district court has the authority to revoke supervised release before the term's expiration, even without a warrant or with a defective warrant. The district court's judgment is summarily affirmed, and all pending motions are denied as moot. The disposition is not intended for publication and cannot be cited in this circuit except under specific rules.