Narrative Opinion Summary
The court has reviewed the record and the appellant’s responses to the order to show cause, concluding that the issues raised in this appeal lack sufficient substance to warrant further argument. Citing the precedent set in United States v. Hooton, the court summarily affirms the district court’s judgment. All pending motions have been denied as moot. The decision is not suitable for publication and cannot be cited in future cases within this circuit, as per 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Legal Issues Addressed
Mootness of Pending Motionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: All motions pending at the time of the appellate court's decision were dismissed as they were rendered moot by the summary affirmation.
Reasoning: All pending motions have been denied as moot.
Non-Citability of Unpublished Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court's decision is not published and cannot be cited in future cases within the circuit, following the rules of the Ninth Circuit.
Reasoning: The decision is not suitable for publication and cannot be cited in future cases within this circuit, as per 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Precedential Authority in Summary Affirmationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The judgment was affirmed by the appellate court based on established precedent, specifically referring to the decision in United States v. Hooton.
Reasoning: Citing the precedent set in United States v. Hooton, the court summarily affirms the district court’s judgment.
Summary Affirmation of Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined that the appellant's issues on appeal did not justify further argument and therefore affirmed the district court’s judgment without a detailed opinion.
Reasoning: The court has reviewed the record and the appellant’s responses to the order to show cause, concluding that the issues raised in this appeal lack sufficient substance to warrant further argument.