You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

McCord v. Ally Financial, Inc. (In re USA United Fleet, Inc.)

Citation: 559 B.R. 41Docket: Case No.: 1-11-45867-ess; Adv. Pro. No.: 1-13-01219-ess

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York; September 27, 2016; Us Bankruptcy; United States Bankruptcy Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding initiated by USA United Fleet, Inc. and affiliates, with the Chapter 7 Trustee pursuing recovery of several transfers made to Ally Financial, Inc. The Trustee claims the transfers, including a $1,311,000 wire transfer and $29,423.73 in car payments, were preferential or fraudulent under various sections of the Bankruptcy Code and New York law. The Trustee seeks to recover these amounts, alleging they were made to hinder or defraud creditors and were executed without fair consideration, rendering the Debtors insolvent. The Trustee also requests attorneys' fees and seeks to disallow any claims filed by Ally against the bankruptcy estate. Ally opposes the Trustee's motion for summary judgment, presenting a defense that the funds in question were not the Debtors' property but were transferred through Shoreline Merge, Inc. as a mere conduit. The court denies both the Trustee's motion for summary judgment on several claims and Ally's cross-motion, citing unresolved material factual disputes, particularly regarding the nature of the transfers and the Debtors' property interest. The court grants Ally's request to file a third-party complaint against individuals involved in the financial transfers, allowing further proceedings to address the unresolved issues.

Legal Issues Addressed

Actual Fraud under New York Debtor and Creditor Law Section 276

Application: The Trustee claimed the transfers were made with actual intent to defraud creditors, and sought recovery under NY DCL Section 276.

Reasoning: The Seventh Claim for Relief, under Bankruptcy Code Sections 544(b), 550(a), and 551, and NY DCL Section 276, claims that the Transfers were made with actual intent to defraud the IRS and the New York State Department of Taxation, also seeking the total amount of $1,340,423.73 plus interest.

Attorneys' Fees under New York Debtor and Creditor Law Section 276-a

Application: The Trustee sought attorneys' fees if the court found the transfers avoidable under NY DCL Section 276.

Reasoning: The Eighth Claim for Relief, under NY DCL Section 276-a, requests attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in the adversary proceeding should the court find the Transfers avoidable.

Chapter 7 Trustee's Powers under Bankruptcy Code Section 547

Application: The Trustee sought to recover a transfer as preferential under Section 547, claiming it was made for an antecedent debt owed by the Debtors to Ally.

Reasoning: In the First Claim for Relief, under Bankruptcy Code Sections 547 and 550, the Trustee claims that the May 2011 Transfer, if made to pay an antecedent debt to Ally, is avoidable, seeking recovery of $1,311,000 plus interest.

Claim Disallowance under Bankruptcy Code Section 502(d)

Application: The Trustee sought to disallow Ally's claims unless the allegedly recoverable transfers were repaid.

Reasoning: The Tenth Claim for Relief under Bankruptcy Code Section 502(d), the Trustee seeks to disallow Ally's claims related to transfers recoverable under various sections of the Bankruptcy Code unless Ally has paid back the amount deemed recoverable.

Constructive Fraud under Bankruptcy Code Section 548(a)(1)(B)

Application: The Trustee claimed that the transfers were constructively fraudulent as they were made without receiving reasonably equivalent value while the Debtors were insolvent.

Reasoning: The Third Claim for Relief, under Bankruptcy Code Sections 548(a)(1)(B), 550, and 551, asserts that the Two-Year Transfers are constructively fraudulent, also seeking $1,323,383.03 plus interest.

Constructive Fraud under New York Debtor and Creditor Law Sections 273, 274, and 275

Application: The Trustee alleged that the transfers were made without fair consideration and either rendered the Debtors insolvent or were made while the Debtors had unreasonably small capital.

Reasoning: The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims for Relief, under Bankruptcy Code Sections 544(b), 550, and 551, and NY DCL Sections 273, 274, and 275 respectively, similarly allege the Transfers are constructively fraudulent, each seeking the full amount of $1,340,423.73 plus interest.

Fraudulent Transfer under Bankruptcy Code Section 548(a)(1)(A)

Application: The Trustee alleged that transfers were made with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, including the IRS and New York State Department of Taxation.

Reasoning: The Second Claim for Relief, under Bankruptcy Code Sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550, alleges that the Two-Year Transfers were made with intent to hinder or defraud creditors, seeking recovery of $1,323,383.03 plus interest.

Unjust Enrichment

Application: The Trustee alleged that Ally was unjustly enriched by the transfers and sought recovery based on common law principles.

Reasoning: The Ninth Claim for Relief, based on common law principles of unjust enrichment, contends that Ally was unjustly enriched and seeks a judgment for at least $1,340,423.73 plus interest.