You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Wieland v. Assaf (In re Briones-Coroy)

Citation: 481 B.R. 685Docket: Bankruptcy No. 10-40900-SBB; Adversary No. 11-01311-SBB

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado; October 23, 2012; Us Bankruptcy; United States Bankruptcy Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves the United States Trustee seeking sanctions and an injunction against Mr. Emmanuel M. Assaf, a bankruptcy petition preparer, for repeated violations of the Bankruptcy Code under 11 U.S.C. 110. The defendant was involved in 241 similar cases, where he exceeded the permissible scope of services by providing legal advice, failing to disclose fees, and collecting court filing fees. The court found that Mr. Assaf's actions constituted unauthorized practice of law, warranting a ten-year nationwide injunction barring him from acting as a bankruptcy petition preparer. This decision aims to prevent further violations and protect debtors, particularly non-English speakers, from potential abuse. Despite prior sanctions and injunctions in California and Colorado, Mr. Assaf continued to operate unlawfully, indicating a persistent pattern of misconduct. The court's findings highlight the need for strict adherence to the statutory limitations placed on bankruptcy petition preparers, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the prohibition of legal advice. The outcome reflects the court's commitment to enforcing compliance with the Bankruptcy Code and safeguarding the interests of vulnerable debtors.

Legal Issues Addressed

Disclosure of Compensation under 11 U.S.C. 110(h)(2)

Application: The defendant failed to disclose all fees received in connection with bankruptcy preparation, violating statutory requirements for transparency in compensation.

Reasoning: The Defendant inaccurately reported only a $200.00 fee on the Statement of Financial Affairs (SOFA) for debt counseling or bankruptcy, while actually charging customers a total of at least $500.00.

Injunctive Relief for Repeated Violations of Bankruptcy Code

Application: A nationwide injunction was warranted to prevent future violations by the defendant, ensuring compliance with the Bankruptcy Code.

Reasoning: The Court lacks confidence that the Defendant will cease these activities without a national injunction, which is deemed necessary to protect vulnerable debtors and uphold the integrity of the bankruptcy system.

Prohibition of Legal Advice by Bankruptcy Petition Preparers under 11 U.S.C. 110(e)(2)

Application: The defendant violated the prohibition against providing legal advice by preparing and advising on legal documents and bankruptcy filings.

Reasoning: Defendant violated section 110(e) by providing legal advice and making decisions for customers while completing Chapter 7 Trustee information sheets.

Role of Bankruptcy Petition Preparers under 11 U.S.C. 110

Application: Bankruptcy petition preparers are restricted to providing administrative support services such as typing and data entry without offering legal advice or engaging in unauthorized practice of law.

Reasoning: Bankruptcy petition preparers are limited to providing only typing, data entry, and photocopying services for individuals who have decided to file for bankruptcy, and they do not possess legal or paralegal authority under the Bankruptcy Code.

Sanctions and Injunctions under 11 U.S.C. 110 for Misconduct

Application: The court imposed a ten-year nationwide injunction on Mr. Assaf, prohibiting him from acting as a bankruptcy petition preparer due to sustained violations of the Bankruptcy Code.

Reasoning: The Court found sufficient evidence of wrongdoing, resulting in a ten-year injunction barring Mr. Assaf from acting as a bankruptcy petition preparer in Colorado and nationwide.

Unauthorized Collection of Court Filing Fees under 11 U.S.C. 110(g)

Application: The defendant was found to have improperly collected court filing fees from debtors, a prohibited action for bankruptcy petition preparers.

Reasoning: The Court concluded that the Defendant violated § 110(g) by allowing employees to collect filing fees or payments from Debtors in at least ten instances.