You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Jensen v. Suntrust Bank (In re Advanced Golf Design, Inc.)

Citations: 272 B.R. 776; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 59; 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1758Docket: Bankruptcy No. 00-12862-9P7; Adversary No. 00-776

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida; November 2, 2001; Us Bankruptcy; United States Bankruptcy Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding where both the Trustee and SunTrust Bank filed motions for summary judgment regarding two certificates of deposit. The Trustee argued that these certificates are part of the bankruptcy estate and that SunTrust lacks a valid security interest or right of setoff over them. The certificates had been pledged for letters of credit, with one being partially drawn upon post-bankruptcy, and the other remaining unused. The Trustee classified the funds as 'special purpose funds,' invoking precedent that such funds are not subject to setoff due to an absence of mutual obligations. SunTrust, however, claimed common law and contractual rights of setoff, arguing that the expiration of the letters of credit nullified the special purpose status. The court partially granted and denied both motions, recognizing the certificates as estate property but subject to SunTrust's security interest, necessitating a further hearing to evaluate the security interest. A pretrial conference was scheduled to continue proceedings.

Legal Issues Addressed

Bankruptcy Estate Property under Chapter 7

Application: The court determined that the certificates of deposit are considered part of the bankruptcy estate under the Trustee's administration.

Reasoning: Consequently, the court partially denies and grants motions for summary judgment from both the Trustee and SunTrust, determining that the C.D.s are estate property under the Trustee's administration...

Expiration of Special Purpose Status

Application: SunTrust claimed that the expiration of the letter of credit negated the special purpose status of the funds, making them indistinguishable from other funds subject to setoff.

Reasoning: SunTrust argues that the first Certificate of Deposit (C.D.) pledged specifically for funding a letter of credit has expired as of December 28, losing its special purpose fund status...

Security Interests and the Bankruptcy Estate

Application: The court recognized SunTrust's security interest in the certificates of deposit but required a hearing to further assess this interest in relation to the bankruptcy estate.

Reasoning: ...pending a hearing to review SunTrust's security interest.

Setoff Rights in Bankruptcy

Application: SunTrust argued for a common law and contractual right of setoff against the funds in question, which the court acknowledged but required further examination at a subsequent hearing.

Reasoning: SunTrust contends that it possesses a common law and contractual right of setoff, asserting that the funds are subject to a valid security interest.

Special Purpose Funds in Bankruptcy

Application: The Trustee argued that the funds were special purpose funds, referencing case law that such funds are not subject to setoff due to the lack of mutual obligations.

Reasoning: The Trustee classifies the funds as 'special purpose funds,' arguing they should not be subject to setoff rights. She references the case In re Ben Franklin Retail Store, Inc., where the court ruled that special purpose funds are not subject to setoff...