Narrative Opinion Summary
Ernest Lee Wynn, Jr. appeals the district court’s order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons articulated in the original order (Wynn v. Badgett, No. 1:10-cv-00490-LO-TCB, E.D. Va. June 7, 2010). The court opted not to hold oral argument, concluding that the facts and legal issues were sufficiently detailed in the submitted materials. The decision is affirmed. Unpublished opinions, such as this one, do not serve as binding precedent in this circuit.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Procedure on Oral Argumentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court decided against holding oral argument, determining that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written submissions.
Reasoning: The court opted not to hold oral argument, concluding that the facts and legal issues were sufficiently detailed in the submitted materials.
Precedential Value of Unpublished Opinionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Unpublished opinions in this circuit do not have binding precedential value.
Reasoning: Unpublished opinions, such as this one, do not serve as binding precedent in this circuit.
Review of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaintssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court reviewed the district court’s denial of relief on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and found no reversible error.
Reasoning: Ernest Lee Wynn, Jr. appeals the district court’s order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons articulated in the original order.