Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Muhammad
Citation: 369 F. App'x 855Docket: No. 07-10605
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; March 4, 2010; Federal Appellate Court
Godlife Asad Muhammad appeals a sentence of 108 months imposed upon resentencing. His counsel has filed an Anders brief indicating there are no grounds for relief and has requested to withdraw as counsel. Muhammad was given the chance to submit a pro se supplemental brief but did not do so. An independent review of the record, following Penson v. Ohio, reveals no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Consequently, the motion to withdraw is granted, and the district court’s judgment is affirmed. This decision is not suitable for publication and is not precedent except as outlined by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.