Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Giles
Citation: 362 F. App'x 367Docket: No. 09-7144
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; January 18, 2010; Federal Appellate Court
Dino Marcellus Giles appeals the district court’s denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) regarding a sentence modification. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons it provided. The case reference is United States v. Giles, No. 1:94-cr-00212-WMN-1 (D.Md. Aug. 7, 2008). The court cited United States v. Hood as relevant precedent and determined that oral argument was unnecessary due to the sufficiency of the written materials. The appeal is affirmed.