Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Gondel v. Pmig 1020, LLC
Citation: 351 F. App'x 791Docket: No. 09-1152
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; November 8, 2009; Federal Appellate Court
Mohammad Gondel and Saleem Iqbal Gondel appeal the dismissal of their complaint by the district court on the grounds of failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. The reviewing court, after examining the record and the parties' briefs, found no reversible error. The decision of the district court is affirmed for the reasons outlined in its prior ruling. The case reference is Gondel v. PMIG 1020, LLC, No. 1:08-cv-01768-CCB, 2009 WL 248681 (D.Md. Jan. 22, 2009). The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal arguments were sufficiently detailed in the submitted materials. The appeal is thus affirmed.