You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Moore v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Haysi Facility

Citation: 343 F. App'x 885Docket: No. 09-6759

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; August 27, 2009; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

DeShawn Moore's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint was reviewed and found to contain no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's decision, referencing the case Moore v. Southwest Va. Reg’l Jail Haysi Facility, No. 7:09-cv-00111-gec-mfu, 2009 WL 1009794 (W.D.Va. Apr. 14, 2009). The court opted not to hold oral argument, concluding that the facts and legal arguments were sufficiently presented in the case materials, and that additional argument would not contribute to the decision-making process. The ruling is affirmed.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of District Court Decision

Application: The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision in the case of Moore v. Southwest Va. Reg’l Jail Haysi Facility, indicating agreement with the lower court's findings.

Reasoning: The court affirmed the district court's decision, referencing the case Moore v. Southwest Va. Reg’l Jail Haysi Facility, No. 7:09-cv-00111-gec-mfu, 2009 WL 1009794 (W.D.Va. Apr. 14, 2009).

Review of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint

Application: The appellate court reviewed DeShawn Moore's appeal regarding the denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and found no reversible error, thereby affirming the lower court's decision.

Reasoning: DeShawn Moore's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint was reviewed and found to contain no reversible error.

Waiver of Oral Argument in Appellate Review

Application: The court chose not to hold oral argument, determining that the written record and legal arguments were adequate for resolving the appeal.

Reasoning: The court opted not to hold oral argument, concluding that the facts and legal arguments were sufficiently presented in the case materials, and that additional argument would not contribute to the decision-making process.