Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Brown
Citation: 323 F. App'x 526Docket: No. 08-30249
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; April 21, 2009; Federal Appellate Court
Norman Anthony Brown appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release, which resulted in a 21-month sentence. His attorney filed a brief under Anders v. California, indicating no grounds for relief and requested to withdraw as counsel. Brown submitted a pro se supplemental brief, but no opposing brief was filed. An independent review of the record, following Penson v. Ohio, revealed no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Consequently, the court granted the attorney's motion to withdraw and affirmed the district court’s order. The decision is not intended for publication and does not serve as precedent, per 9th Cir. R. 36-3.