Narrative Opinion Summary
Edward Charles Hunter appeals the district court's order that granted a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) but denied a further reduction and the appointment of counsel. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its ruling. The case references United States v. Hunter, No. 4:04-cr-00122-WDK-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 8, 2008, entered July 10, 2008). The court decided to forgo oral argument, determining that the facts and legal issues were sufficiently addressed in the submitted materials. The judgment is affirmed.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review for Reversible Errorsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error.
Reasoning: The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its ruling.
Decision to Forgo Oral Argumentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the submitted materials.
Reasoning: The court decided to forgo oral argument, determining that the facts and legal issues were sufficiently addressed in the submitted materials.
Denial of Appointment of Counselsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The district court's decision to deny the appointment of counsel was reviewed and found to have no reversible error.
Reasoning: Edward Charles Hunter appeals the district court's order that granted a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) but denied a further reduction and the appointment of counsel.
Sentence Reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The district court granted a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) but denied a further reduction.
Reasoning: Edward Charles Hunter appeals the district court's order that granted a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) but denied a further reduction.