Florists' Mutual Insurance v. DL&B Enterprises, Inc.
Docket: No. 08-13922
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; April 2, 2009; Federal Appellate Court
The court affirms the district court's judgment based on an alternative holding regarding the speculative nature of damages. The central issue of whether DL&B purchased goods or services from LTF is acknowledged as a close question but is not addressed. Instead, the court concludes that DL&B's evidence of damages does not satisfy the standard set by Georgia law. The judgment is therefore upheld.