Narrative Opinion Summary
Reginald Leon Edwards appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration regarding a sentence modification under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) from 2006. The appellate court, after reviewing the record, found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's decision, referencing the reasons provided in the original order. The case is noted as United States v. Edwards, No. 6:07-cr00014-nkm-1 from the Western District of Virginia, dated November 5, 2008. Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the submitted materials. The affirmation is based on a per curiam opinion, and it is noted that unpublished opinions do not serve as binding precedent in this circuit.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review and Reversible Errorsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court reviewed the record and upheld the district court's decision, indicating no reversible error was found in the proceedings.
Reasoning: The appellate court, after reviewing the record, found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's decision, referencing the reasons provided in the original order.
Oral Argument in Appellate Proceedingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the submitted materials were sufficient to present the facts and legal issues.
Reasoning: Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the submitted materials.
Precedential Value of Unpublished Opinionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court noted that unpublished opinions do not serve as binding precedent in this circuit, affecting the weight and authority of the decision.
Reasoning: The affirmation is based on a per curiam opinion, and it is noted that unpublished opinions do not serve as binding precedent in this circuit.
Sentence Modification under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellant's request for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) was denied, and the appellate court found no reversible error in this decision.
Reasoning: Reginald Leon Edwards appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration regarding a sentence modification under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) from 2006.