Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Shrader
Citation: 547 F. App'x 321Docket: No. 13-6960
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; December 3, 2013; Federal Appellate Court
Thomas Creighton Shrader appeals the district court's denial of his motions for new trials under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. Upon reviewing the record, the appellate court found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's decision, citing the reasoning provided in the original ruling. Shrader contends that the district court failed to address all of his arguments regarding the stalking charges. However, the appellate court determined that these arguments did not introduce new evidence but were merely rehashes of previous arguments based on known facts. Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the issues were sufficiently presented in the existing materials. The final ruling is an affirmation of the district court's orders.