Narrative Opinion Summary
The district court's orders denying Dickinson Norman Adionser relief on his civil complaint under the Privacy Act of 1974, the Freedom of Information Act, and the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act have been affirmed. The court found no reversible error after reviewing the record. Additionally, Adionser's motion to alter or amend the previous ruling was also denied. The case, referenced as Adionser v. United States, was adjudicated in the District of Maryland. Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the case materials.
Legal Issues Addressed
Federal Declaratory Judgment Actsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Adionser's civil complaint under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act was dismissed, with the court affirming the denial of relief.
Reasoning: The district court's orders denying Dickinson Norman Adionser relief on his civil complaint under... the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act have been affirmed.
Freedom of Information Actsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The district court's decision included a denial of relief under the Freedom of Information Act, with the court finding no reversible error.
Reasoning: The district court's orders denying Dickinson Norman Adionser relief on his civil complaint under... the Freedom of Information Act... have been affirmed.
Motion to Alter or Amend Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The district court denied Adionser's motion to alter or amend the previous ruling, supporting the initial decision without finding reversible error.
Reasoning: Additionally, Adionser's motion to alter or amend the previous ruling was also denied.
Oral Argument Unnecessarysubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials.
Reasoning: Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the facts and legal issues were sufficiently presented in the case materials.
Privacy Act of 1974subscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The district court denied relief to Adionser on his civil complaint under the Privacy Act of 1974, finding no reversible error upon review.
Reasoning: The district court's orders denying Dickinson Norman Adionser relief on his civil complaint under the Privacy Act of 1974... have been affirmed.