Narrative Opinion Summary
Gregory Bryce Tanner's appeal of the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint has been affirmed by a PER CURIAM opinion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, leading to the conclusion that the district court's reasoning was sound. The case, Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate, was initially filed in the Eastern District of Virginia on June 16, 2008, and entered on June 17, 2008. The court decided to forgo oral argument, determining that the existing materials sufficiently presented the facts and legal issues. The decision is not a binding precedent in the circuit due to its unpublished nature.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaintssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision for reversible errors in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and found none, affirming the lower court's decision.
Reasoning: The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, leading to the conclusion that the district court's reasoning was sound.
Unpublished Opinions as Non-Binding Precedentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision in this case is not considered binding precedent within the circuit because it is unpublished.
Reasoning: The decision is not a binding precedent in the circuit due to its unpublished nature.
Waiver of Oral Argument in Appellate Proceedingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court chose to dispense with oral argument, deciding that the written record adequately presented the necessary facts and legal issues.
Reasoning: The court decided to forgo oral argument, determining that the existing materials sufficiently presented the facts and legal issues.