Narrative Opinion Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on October 31, 2005, denying an application for leave to appeal from a June 1, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals in the case of Darrick Lee-Doman Smith. The Court concluded that the issues raised did not warrant review. Justice Kelly expressed a differing opinion, suggesting that the case should be held in abeyance pending the outcome of "People v Drohan," for which leave to appeal had been granted. The order was certified as a true and complete copy by the Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court.
Legal Issues Addressed
Certification of Judicial Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The order from the Michigan Supreme Court was certified as a true and complete copy, ensuring the authenticity and official status of the court's decision.
Reasoning: The order was certified as a true and complete copy by the Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court.
Denial of Application for Leave to Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Michigan Supreme Court denied the application for leave to appeal, indicating that the issues raised were not significant enough to warrant review.
Reasoning: The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on October 31, 2005, denying an application for leave to appeal from a June 1, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals in the case of Darrick Lee-Doman Smith.
Judicial Disagreement on Case Handlingsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justice Kelly expressed disagreement with the majority's decision, proposing that the case should be held in abeyance pending a related decision, highlighting procedural considerations in the appellate process.
Reasoning: Justice Kelly expressed a differing opinion, suggesting that the case should be held in abeyance pending the outcome of 'People v Drohan,' for which leave to appeal had been granted.