Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Bibbs
Citation: 478 F. App'x 753Docket: No. 12-6560
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; August 2, 2012; Federal Appellate Court
Charles Benjamin Bibbs, III, appeals the district court's order that granted his motion for modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The reviewing court found no reversible error in the district court's decision and affirmed the ruling based on the district court's reasoning. The case citation is United States v. Bibbs, No. 4:05-cr-00032-AWA-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2012). The court determined that oral argument was unnecessary as the facts and legal arguments were sufficiently presented in the existing materials. The decision is affirmed. Unpublished opinions like this one are not binding precedent in the circuit.