Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Molina-Ochoa
Citation: 531 F. App'x 782Docket: No. 12-10416
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; June 21, 2013; Federal Appellate Court
William Molina-Ochoa appeals the judgment that revoked his supervised release and imposed a 21-month sentence. His counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, asserting no grounds for relief and requesting to withdraw as counsel. Molina-Ochoa was given the opportunity to submit a pro se supplemental brief but did not do so. An independent review of the record, in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, revealed no viable grounds for relief on appeal. The court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed the judgment. The disposition is not intended for publication and does not set a precedent, as specified by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.