You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.

Citation: 474 F. App'x 234Docket: No. 12-1162

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; June 21, 2012; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court's orders that granted summary judgment in favor of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., dismissing her claims, and denied her motion for reconsideration. The appellate review found no reversible error in the district court's decision, leading to an affirmation of the lower court's ruling. The court also granted Lassiter's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing her to continue the appeal without incurring costs. Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the presented materials sufficiently addressed the facts and legal issues. The case citation is Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Indus. Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2012).

Legal Issues Addressed

In Forma Pauperis Status

Application: The appellate court granted the appellant's request to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing her to appeal without bearing the costs associated with the process.

Reasoning: The court also granted Lassiter's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing her to continue the appeal without incurring costs.

Motion for Reconsideration

Application: The district court's denial of the motion for reconsideration was affirmed, suggesting the court did not find sufficient grounds to revisit its prior decision.

Reasoning: Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court's orders that [...] denied her motion for reconsideration.

Oral Argument Not Required

Application: The appellate court determined that oral argument was unnecessary, relying on the sufficiency of the written materials to address the legal issues.

Reasoning: Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the presented materials sufficiently addressed the facts and legal issues.

Summary Judgment Standards

Application: The district court's granting of summary judgment was upheld upon appellate review, indicating that there was no reversible error in the lower court's application of the summary judgment standards.

Reasoning: Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court's orders that granted summary judgment in favor of Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., dismissing her claims.