Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
United States v. Veal
Citation: 515 F. App'x 239Docket: No. 13-6016
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; March 29, 2013; Federal Appellate Court
Janison Veal's appeal against the district court's denial of his motion to correct a clerical error under Fed.R.Crim. P. 36 has been affirmed by a PER CURIAM opinion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, thus upholding the district court's decision. The opinion notes that unpublished opinions are not binding precedent within this circuit. Oral argument was deemed unnecessary as the facts and legal arguments were sufficiently presented in the submitted materials. The case reference is United States v. Veal, No. 3:02-cr-00043-JPB-JES-1 (ND.W.Va. Dec. 14, 2012).